A question companies ask

The question: People across our company are building apps and agents with AI. How do we see and govern all of them?

How to govern the apps and tools people build with AI

Give every AI-built tool the same registry, the same rules and the same record. On Substrait, every tool, agent and page is registered with an owner and a risk tier, passes the organisation's policy before production, and leaves an audit trail nobody can alter.

Last updated

Why this is hard

AI-built tools arrive from many people, through many AI models, at a pace no review board can match. A review of each change one by one is slow, and builders route around it. No review at all means nobody knows which tools exist, who owns them or what data they touch.

What Substrait does

One registry for everything people build. Substrait registers every tool as an object with an owner, a purpose, a risk tier and a version. Substrait governs five kinds: Slates, knowledge bases, skills, web apps and agents.

Rules set once, applied to every tool. Each organisation sets its own policies and risk tiers in Substrait. A change that satisfies the policy is approved automatically. A change the policy flags goes to the right human approver, with deadlines and escalation.

Limits instead of reviews. An approval on Substrait sets a boundary: which data, read or write, customer-facing or not. Builders change the tool freely inside that boundary. A change that crosses the boundary goes back through approval.

A record nobody can alter. Substrait keeps an audit trail of every access and action. A platform admin cannot edit it, and it exports to your security monitoring.

A switch for every tool. Every tool on Substrait can be rolled back to the last good version or switched off.

Substrait console: a builder's tools shown as cards, each with its status and environment.
Each builder's tools in one place. Product UI. Sample data.

Questions and answers

What is the difference between governing AI-built tools and governing data?

Data governance catalogues what a company owns. Substrait governs what a company builds: each tool's owner, its risk tier, the data it was granted, the checks it passed and every change after that.

Does governance slow builders down?

Not on Substrait. An approval sets limits once: which data, read or write, customer-facing or not. Changes inside those limits ship without a new review. Only a change that crosses a limit goes back for approval.

Can Substrait govern agents as well as apps?

Yes. On Substrait an agent is a tool its builder owns. Each agent has its own identity, its own limits, a record of every action it takes for a person, and a switch that stops it.

Related

Start with a result, not a rollout.

Book a demo and bring one real use case. We will show you how a tool your people build goes live on Substrait, with its data approved and its security check passed.